






4theluvofgold wrote:It is like Russ said. I have been a part of many fights. Spent many hours going from location to location. Many of the support factors were busted by piddly little differences and uneducated assumptions. Those led to peoples lives being in between the rails of an oncoming train..
Miners are miners. Gold is over there! No Over there! California is better, Colorado is better, Alaska is better.
Quotes in the past which have been said to me as examples "We should move on from California and defend other states before we lose them too!" "If we take back California it will have precedence over other states!" Both quotes from respected miners I have. Form a group and you will have disposition on how decisions are made.
Until miners can actually unite instead of thinking others are "claim jumping" ideas or people who take lead investing their time to get ditched and thrown under the busses it won't happen. I will gladly put my effort forward for my son who loves talking about digging with me.
Sierra Sam wrote:DJR- no offense intended "...we either all start pulling in the same direction or they will win..."
us vs. "them" - most always turns into a war cry. War cries lead to battles. Battles lead to collateral damage. Original issues become clouded like waters downstream of a claim. Then a broad brush is brought in by the "US", as in WE, the people, and then "we" end up paying annually renewable fees for every little element of prospecting, including paying for the officials who will be conducting random inspections to insure the letter of the new laws are being adhered to.
However, since "we" doesn't include, necessarily, those exemptions as applied to "Native" Americans. In such case the "we" more refers to those who basically squatted on lands otherwise "occupied" by those tribes and peoples who had resided, and whos culture and customs had evolved in the area for hundreds, if not thousands of years, as of relatively recently.
The dilemma of bringing Native Americans and the United States Government (that's "we") together on issues has been going on since the two met for the first time a while back.
All I know is that I don't want to have to take a test like I do to drive. And if you think about it, could you possibly envision a requirement to carry miners insurance? You know, just in case a fish dies within your claim? Or someone trips over your rig? Or someone witnesses a fish being diverted from it's "normal' path of travel?
I say, let's try a bit more on the "we" thing if we can.
russau wrote:yes it would be really good if all concerned groups would band together, but it aint gonna happen in my lifetime! everyone has their own agenda they adhear to!so i cant see it happening..........ever! heck you cant even get Americans to agree that our Country is going down the toilet the way things are right now!some say yes and others say no!and everyone has their own opinion,right or wrong, its theirs to make!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests